FunKey S vs Anbernic RG NANO

← All comparisons

The main difference between the FunKey S and the RG NANO is size.

The FunKey S measures 42.5 x 44.5 x 13.8 mm and weighs 30 g; the RG NANO measures 43 x 71 x 17 mm and weighs 75 g.

Other differences

Which is better

Pocketability

Which fits in a pocket better?

FunKey S

The FunKey S (42.5 x 44.5 x 13.8 mm, 30 g). The RG NANO is 43 x 71 x 17 mm, 75 g. Both fit a jeans pocket.

PS2

Which is better for PS2 games, the FunKey S or the RG NANO?

Neither

Neither plays PS2 games.

Price

Which costs less?

RG NANO

The RG NANO, at about $60 at launch against $70. Prices today vary by store and the used market.

GBA

Which is better for GBA games?

Tie

Both run GBA at full speed and fill about the same share of the screen with even pixels: 67% of the FunKey S's screen at 1x, 67% of the RG NANO's screen at 1x.

Battery

Which has the bigger battery?

RG NANO

The RG NANO, at 1,050 mAh against 410 mAh. Same chip, so the bigger battery should last longer.

Side by side

FunKey SRG NANO
Launch price$70$60
ReleasedJan 2021Jun 2023
Plays well up toPS1PS1
ShapeClamshellVertical
SoftwareLinuxLinux
ChipAllwinner V3sAllwinner V3s
Memory64 MB64 MB
Screen1.54 inch IPS 1:11.54 inch IPS 1:1
Resolution240 x 240240 x 240
Battery410 mAh1,050 mAh
Weight30 g75 g
Size42.5 x 44.5 x 13.8 mm43 x 71 x 17 mm
Analog sticksNoneNone
L2 and R2NoNo
Wi-FiNoNo
Video outNoNo
Headphone jackNoNo

Green marks the better value where one is clearly better. Prices are launch prices.

Emulation

  1. FunKey SRG NANO
  2. Game Boy100100
  3. NES100100
  4. Genesis100100
  5. GBA8080
  6. SNES8080
  7. PS18080

100 means the system runs at full speed with no known issues.

Full details

We may earn a commission when you buy through these links.

More comparisons

Why this pair: buyers weigh these two against each other. 43 comments by 38 different people compare them in community discussions, and 15 post titles name both. Specs, emulation scores and launch prices from the retrocatalog.com handheld database.